RFK Jr Banned on IG Why is this important?
#theuncomfortabletruths About this story are manifold but for the sake of shortened attention spans today I will address a few main points. Also, I must add I'm neither for or against RFK Jr. Primarily because I'm not exactly sure what role he plays in the grand scheme of things as media is a controlled entity. Designed for you to see what they want you to see and suppress what they don't want you to see like in the 1980's movie "They Live" with Roddy Piper. Great example is the gorilla glue girl. Is that even newsworthy with all that's going on in the world or a distraction? I digress, this crack down on anti vaccine speech hit the biggest opponent with a hard blow losing an audience of 800k. But I will say early on I do agree with the effort and years of extensive research he's put into exposing the longstanding effects and even deaths from vaccines. So here's the dilemma I would think the articles would be riddled with false claims that lead to his timely dismissal. However, in reviewing other articles I only found something about a link to Hank Aaron's death. When did social media providers become the police of freedom of speech? One would think on the world wide web you can find most anything of interest and come to your own conclusions. Why suppress free thought unless (social media via the instruction of government allegedly) wants to create a narrative that supports a particular point of view that promotes an agenda to obtain a preconceived end goal. Let's look at some facts according to Shayna Greene of Newsweek. The Facts
According to 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22, "No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings."
In other words, companies that manufacture vaccines are not liable if someone has an allergic reaction or injury after being vaccinated.
However, individuals can file a petition with the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) administered by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to receive compensation if they are found to have been injured by one of the vaccines covered by VICP. According to the Health Resources and Services Administration under HHS, "even in cases in which such a finding is not made, petitioners may receive compensation through a settlement."
VICP, also known as "vaccine court" has been accepting petitions, also known as claims, since 1988, and has paid about $4.4 billion in overall compensation, according to CNBC.
Though VICP covers vaccines for diseases including human papillomavirus (HPV), measles, mumps, polio and seasonal influenza, it does not cover any COVID-19 vaccines.
So with all that being said the fact is 4.4 Billion has been paid in compensation and you cannot sue for any Covid 19 vaccines. Any intelligent person can conclude that some vaccines have proven to be unsafe or at the very least caused injury that cost these companies billions in the past. Yet we're told this new vaccine made in months is 95% effective without years of unbiased research. Is this a risk you're willing to take considering you have no recourse if you're left permanently disabled or dead? Are you willing to risk your livelihood to the opinions of paid Doctors promoted to you on the nightly news? In my opinion the point of making this mainstream news is to send a message that soon you will not be able to use these platforms if you choose to think for yourself. If you want more articles or commentary like this simply join my email as I do the research to keep you abreast of what going on. For more a expansive look into subjects like this you can grab a copy of my book "The Uncomfortable Truth" on Amazon under Timm Knight
what's going on.